RTX vs RX — Model-by-Model Performance Matchup (RTX 20 → RTX 50)

Quick takeaway: AMD often leads raw raster (traditional) FPS per dollar and provides more VRAM on many SKUs; NVIDIA tends to win in ray tracing and upscaling (DLSS / Frame Generation) where supported. See the per-pair breakdowns below.

RTX 2060 vs Radeon RX 5600 XT — 1080p value match

Performance analysis

Multiple head-to-head benches show the 5600 XT and RTX 2060 occupy the same value slot: in pure raster workloads they are very close and sometimes the 5600 XT wins by a small margin, especially in AMD-optimized titles. However, when ray tracing is enabled the 2060 has an advantage thanks to dedicated RT cores and access to DLSS upscaling — this can make previously unplayable RT modes usable on the 2060 while the 5600 XT cannot handle ray tracing well. Representative tests: TechSpot’s 32-game comparison found very similar raster results with occasional advantages to the 5600 XT. :contentReference[oaicite:0]{index=0}

Pros & Cons

• RTX 2060: DLSS + RT support, broader NVIDIA feature-set.
• RTX 2060: Older architecture, only 6 GB VRAM (can be limiting in modern titles).
• RX 5600 XT: Strong raster value — often cheaper on street price historically.
• RX 5600 XT: No hardware RT; no DLSS.

Recommendation

If you play mostly rasterized titles at 1080p and want best bang-for-buck, the 5600 XT is competitive. If you plan to use ray tracing or want better upscaling options where available, favor the 2060.

RTX 3060 Ti vs Radeon RX 6700 XT — the 1440p midfield duel

Performance analysis

Head-to-head results show the RX 6700 XT often enjoying a raster advantage in some modern titles — TechSpot measured margins where the 6700 XT was roughly ~10–13% faster than the 3060 Ti in certain games (e.g., Warzone in their dataset). However, the 3060 Ti recovers in RT-enabled scenarios when DLSS is available, preserving playable framerates. The 12 GB VRAM on many 6700 XT SKUs is also a practical advantage at higher resolutions or with heavy textures. :contentReference[oaicite:1]{index=1}

Pros & Cons

• 3060 Ti: Excellent 1440p raster performance with strong RT support and DLSS upscaling.
• 3060 Ti: 8 GB VRAM can be limiting in some modern 1440p/4K workloads.
• 6700 XT: Often faster in raw raster tests and typically ships with higher VRAM.
• 6700 XT: Ray tracing performance and DLSS-equivalent benefits lag NVIDIA in many titles.

Recommendation

If you prioritize pure raster 1440p performance and VRAM, choose the 6700 XT. If you play RT-enabled titles and value DLSS/Frame Generation, choose the 3060 Ti.

RTX 3070 vs Radeon RX 6800 — 1440p / 4K contenders

Performance analysis

TechSpot and other labs consistently show the RX 6800 outperforming the 3070 in many raster workloads — in some tests the 6800 recorded double-digit percent leads (20–27% in certain titles). The 16 GB VRAM is also a notable advantage for 6800 at 4K or with high-resolution texture mods. That said, the 3070's RT + DLSS advantages can flip results in ray-traced titles or when DLSS/Frame Generation is enabled. :contentReference[oaicite:2]{index=2}

Pros & Cons

• RTX 3070: Strong RT support and NVIDIA upscaling ecosystem; consistent performance across many titles.
• RTX 3070: 8 GB VRAM is smaller compared to modern AMD alternatives.
• RX 6800: Excellent raster performance and 16 GB VRAM for future-proofing.
• RX 6800: RT performance weaker; DLSS alternative quality may vary.

Recommendation

Choose RX 6800 if you value raw raster FPS and VRAM for 4K/texture-heavy scenarios. Choose RTX 3070 if ray tracing and DLSS support in specific games are priorities.

RTX 3080 vs Radeon RX 6800 XT — 4K performance & trade-offs

Performance analysis

Revisited benchmarks show the RTX 3080 and RX 6800 XT are close in many modern titles — the 3080 often wins at native 4K and in RT-heavy cases due to DLSS, while the 6800 XT shines in raster-only workloads and benefits from larger VRAM. TechSpot’s re-evaluations find the 3080 usually nudging ahead at 4K especially where NVIDIA's upscaling is available. :contentReference[oaicite:3]{index=3}

Pros & Cons

• RTX 3080: Excellent 4K performance with DLSS and stronger RT handling.
• RTX 3080: Less VRAM vs some AMD cards on some SKUs (10–12 GB).
• RX 6800 XT: Strong raster 1440p/4K performance and ample VRAM (16 GB).
• RX 6800 XT: Weaker ray tracing performance relative to NVIDIA.

Recommendation

For the best native 4K with RT and DLSS, the 3080 remains a top pick. For raw raster performance and VRAM at 1440p–4K, consider the 6800 XT.

RTX 3090 vs Radeon RX 6900 XT — extreme 4K & creator use

Performance analysis

The RTX 3090’s large 24 GB framebuffer and broader CUDA ecosystem make it a stronger choice for creators and heavy compute workloads compared to the RX 6900 XT. For pure gaming, the 6900 XT is competitive in raster workloads but lacks the compute & CUDA advantages of NVIDIA’s flagship. Tom’s Hardware’s coverage of the 6900 XT highlights these differences in creator and compute scenarios. :contentReference[oaicite:4]{index=4}

Recommendation

If you need large VRAM for content creation, 3D rendering, or AI workloads — choose the RTX 3090. For gaming-first 4K performance with a competitive price, the 6900 XT is excellent.

RTX 4070 vs Radeon RX 7800 XT — Ada vs RDNA3 midrange

Performance analysis

TechSpot’s head-to-head testing shows the 7800 XT often posting 10–28% higher raster FPS than the RTX 4070 at 1080p/1440p in several modern titles. However, the 4070 leverages DLSS 3/Frame Generation in supported titles to recover significant performance in RT-enabled scenarios. Choose based on whether you prioritize raw raster FPS or RT+frame-generation features. :contentReference[oaicite:5]{index=5}

Recommendation

Prefer RX 7800 XT for maximum raster value and VRAM; prefer RTX 4070 if you rely on DLSS/FrameGen and RT features in your favorite games.

RTX 4080 vs Radeon RX 7900 XTX — high-end 4K match

Performance analysis

Benchmarks show the 7900 XTX frequently takes the lead in raster scenarios and benefits from a large 24 GB framebuffer for texture-heavy 4K workloads. The RTX 4080 often outperforms when ray tracing and DLSS are used. TechSpot’s detailed comparisons highlight game-dependent flip-flops between these two tier leaders. :contentReference[oaicite:6]{index=6}

Recommendation

For raw 4K raster power and maximum VRAM, choose the RX 7900 XTX. For best RT experience and DLSS-powered upscaling, choose the RTX 4080.

RTX 5070 vs Radeon RX 9070 — 2025 midrange showdown

Performance analysis

Recent 2025 reviews and head-to-heads (GamersNexus, The Verge,  PC Gamer) show AMD’s RX 9070 frequently outperforming NVIDIA’s RTX 5070 in raster workloads and offering higher VRAM at competitive prices; NVIDIA’s 5070 is stronger where DLSS 4 / MFG is available and in some creator tasks. GamersNexus found wide differences in RT-heavy scenarios where NVIDIA still dominates, while PC Gamer named the RX 9070 a very competitive midrange choice for most gamers. :contentReference[oaicite:7]{index=7}

Recommendation

If you want the best 1440p raster performance and value in 2025, RX 9070 is an excellent pick. If your favorite titles use DLSS 4 / FrameGen heavily, consider the RTX 5070 for RT-heavy play.

Conclusion — practical buying rules

• Raw raster FPS per dollar: AMD (RDNA2/3/4) often wins.
• Ray tracing & upscaling: NVIDIA (DLSS / Frame Generation) usually holds the edge in supported titles.
• VRAM & future-proofing: AMD cards often ship with more VRAM at similar price points — beneficial at 4K and for texture-heavy games.
• Creator/compute workflows: NVIDIA’s CUDA ecosystem offers advantages for many creative applications.
• Final decision: Always compare per-game benchmarks and current local prices before buying — the “best” card changes as drivers and prices shift.

FAQ (short)

Which is better for 1440p gaming — RTX or RX?

If you want maximum raster FPS per dollar, AMD RX cards typically win. If you play RT-enabled titles with DLSS/FrameGen support, NVIDIA often provides smoother RT experience.

Does DLSS make a real difference?

Yes — DLSS (especially DLSS 2/3/4 and Frame Generation) can increase effective playable FPS in RT-enabled or high-resolution scenarios, sometimes turning an unplayable RT setting into a playable one.